Central District Conference Board calls for independent external investigation, asks MCC and MAST to agree on terms
On March 26, 2025, the Board of the Central District Conference of Mennonite Church USA wrote to MCC US leaders and to the MAST steering committee. CDC board members have given MAST permission to post this letter on our website.
The CDC board is the first church entity from among MCC's 14 sponsoring denominations to make a strong and public request for an independent external investigation - one which:
(1) addresses all allegations of bad endings with MCC, by providing “a hearing for all those who separated from MCC under contested or contentious circumstances”;
(2) calls for an external review of MCC policies;
(3) recognizes the need for the investigation to produce a public report, and
(4) insist that both MCC and MAST need to approve of the choice of investigative firm.
MAST responds to MCC’s “monograph” of “apology”
On Feb. 25, 2025, MCC began to circulate a “monograph” which it is calling “an apology.”
To us, this comes across primarily as further damage control, minimization, and denial – a classic “fauxpology.”
In its statement, MCC consistently minimizes the allegations and the harm, referring to workers who “experienced pain” or “left MCC feeling wounded,” while taking responsibility only in a vague way for unspecified occasions when MCC “systems were slow, unresponsive or dismissive,” when policies were not shared properly or communication “devalued or disempowered” workers. MCC falsely claims that “resolution” has occurred in cases of staff separation from MCC.
MCC’s vague apologies for poor communication and unclear policies are offensive in light of the seriousness of the allegations, and look like a way to pacify donors while failing to get to the bottom of what actually occurred.
Read further for reactions by Stephanie Krehbiel, Julene Fast, and Kim Thiessen.
MAST responds to MCC statement that denies “claims of systemic abuse”
On February 5, 2025, MCC posted a public statement in which the organization defends its decision to terminate John and Anicka’s employment in August 2023, “unequivocally” denies “claims of systemic abuse,” and emphasizes MCC’s integrity and care for staff in “difficult and complex situations.”
MAST finds this statement misleading, insulting, and harmful.
John and Anicka say, “by leaving out the most significant pieces of our story (our reports of abuse, the NDA, and the harsh and vicious character of the termination), MCC’s entire story becomes grotesquely misleading.”
Read further for more details, and a general response from MAST as a whole.
Press release, January 31, 2025
MCC reaches non-confidential legal settlement with John Clarke and Anicka Fast
MCC releases misleading internal statement about the legal settlement and the Veritas investigation
MCC’s “internal third-party investigation” by Veritas Solutions finds that “senior MCC staff as a whole” engaged in harassment against John and Anicka
MAST calls for negotiations about an external investigation during upcoming “facilitated conversations”
MAST launches website at https://www.mccabusesurvivors.org/.
Survivors share the deep pain and isolation they feel due to unquestioned MCC loyalty in their communities
Mennonite church leaders support survivors at story-sharing event Dec 12, 2024
MCC releases internal statement about the legal settlement with John and Anicka and the Veritas investigation findings, Jan. 23, 2025
January 23, 2025. MCC Executive Directors sent an email to all staff with an update about the resolution of the legal case with John and Anicka, and a FAQ document about the case and the Veritas Investigation results.
MAST has written a response to this FAQ, which it considers to be “problematic, misleading, and inaccurate in multiple ways.”
Canadian Mennonite reports on Veritas investigation findings, labour board conciliation planned for Jan. 22, 2025, and facilitated discussions brokered by church leaders
One day prior to a planned conciliation meeting between John Clarke and Anicka Fast and Mennonite Central Committee as part of a Québec Labor Board dispute, Canadian Mennonite reports on the Veritas Solutions investigation findings and interviews Fast and Clarke about their expectations for the conciliation process, their reaction to the investigation findings, and their hopes for a restorative solution through a facilitated conversation being brokered by César García (general secretary of Mennonite World Conference) and Marisa Smucker (executive director of Mennonite Mission Network).
Veritas Solutions determines that actions by MCC “senior personnel” toward John Clarke and Anicka Fast constitute multiple counts of “harassment.”
Veritas Solutions determines that actions by MCC “senior personnel” toward John Clarke and Anicka Fast constitute multiple counts of “harassment.”
Investigative article: “MCC accused of inadequate response to sexual assault allegation in Mozambique”
During her four years with MCC, Moyer worked on seven sand dams, seconded by MCC to Conselho Cristão de Moçambique (Christian Council of Mozambique—CCM) in the city of Tete. She loved the work. Moyer, who still lives in the country—now working for Equip Mozambique—is proud of the work she was part of and the people whose lives are better today because of it.
But Moyer paid a high price. In two interviews with Canadian Mennonite, Moyer told of a troubled workplace at CCM Tete… and alleged sexual assault by a fellow MCC worker.
She also speaks of how MCC’s response to sensitive and difficult situations failed to meet her needs.
Investigative article: “Involuntary: Terminated MCC workers call for accountability and change”
“The concerns of the terminated workers raise questions about how MCC, and, by implication, other organizations, deal with internal conflicts and how the influence of human resources (HR) practices affect organizational culture.
Several people who have held leadership positions with MCC or related organizations are also raising concerns about MCC culture and/or the termination of Fast and Clarke.”
“Clarke said he does not want a sense of the “unquestioned sacredness” of MCC to prevent people from requiring accountability of MCC leaders. He does not want the “beloved” organization to be turned into an “idol” that cannot be questioned.”